The Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar is a leading peer-reviewed and open-access journal, which publishes high-quality and innovative scientific work at the forefront of all sciences in the form of interdisciplinary research and book reviews in the field of basic education.
The scope of studies for works that can be published in the Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar in accordance with Permendikbud Number 15 of 2018 concerning Fulfilling the Workload of Teachers, Principals, School Supervisors and Educational Observers, includes:
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer-Reviewed||Open Access|
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Open Access|
Papers with revised categories will be returned to the authors by the Editor. Authors are given a maximum of 4 weeks from the date of notification to make revisions. After 4 weeks, the revised manuscript will be considered a new submission. In addition, the manuscript may be returned to the author by the Editor prior to review, if the manuscript is judged to be out of scope, outside the limits of word length guidelines, or not adequately prepared for publication.
Click here to get the information about author guidelines.
Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar adheres to a Double-Blind Peer-Review process that is rapid and fair and also ensures a high quality of articles published.
Papers submitted to the Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar will be examined by the editorial team regarding their scope, writing style, and plagiarism. Manuscripts that meet the criteria for the focus and scope of the journal will proceed to a review process which will at least be reviewed by reviewers who are committed to the double-blind review system. A reviewer is a journal partner of experts in the field in accordance with the scope of the journal. The editor will send an e-mail via OJS to the selected reviewer regarding the title and content of the manuscript, as well as an invitation to enter the journal website to complete the review process. Reviewers log on to the journal's website to approve reviews, download manuscripts, post comments, and select recommendations. The review process by reviewers is carried out in at least 4-5 weeks. The results will be returned to the author for action. Manuscripts that meet the requirements will be published.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Every manuscript that is submitted to Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar is recommended to use reference management by using the Mendeley or Zotero application in the citation process and bibliography writing and in the APA Style 6th format.
Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar is published three times a year (March, July, and November).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All publication by Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA). Access permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at the digital libraries and open access journal databases.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar strongly condemns and prevents the practice of plagiarism. All received manuscripts must pass a check for similarity level. Every manuscript submitted to this journal will be processed for plagiarism screening.
To ensure the originality of the articles, the Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar uses various plagiarism checkers available. The most common tools used are Google search engine, plagiarism checker, and Turnitin. A plagiarism check is conducted in the screening process of the submitted manuscripts. Only plagiarism-free manuscripts are sent to the assigned editor(s) to be followed up with the review process. Submissions with minor plagiarism issues will be notified to revise and resubmit, while manuscript with serious plagiarism issues will be rejected and archived.
According to the general publication policy of the journal of Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, only the researchers who contributed to the work in a real sense should be considered as an author. Authors should be responsible to disclose all the personal and financial relationships, which might bias their work. Financial relationships such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony can be classified as the most easily identifiable conflicts-of-interest and the most likely to undermine the credibility of the journal. To clarify the conflicts-of-interest issues, authors must submit a letter to the editorial office accompanying the submitted manuscript and explicitly state if any potential conflicts exist or not.
Peer Reviewers should be responsible to decline the review process if any substantial conflicts-of-interest exists. In case of any doubt, they should consult the Editor to make a decision regarding the review process. Researchers from authors' institutions should not be considered as peer reviewers to prevent any conflicts-of-interest.
Editors should be responsible to manage the review process and have the right of declining any submission in case of any conflict-of-interest. They should not have any direct personal and/or financial conflicts with their assigned manuscripts. They should not be assigned to manuscripts if they are on the author's list of them.